Tomasz Berkieta vs Adan Freire Da Silva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Predicting Tennis Match Outcomes

1. Recent Trends in Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, Silva has demonstrated superior skill on their second serve, winning 52.46% of points, while Berkieta has achieved a 44.88% success rate. It is worth noting that there exists a notable correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
2. Return Game Statistics in Recent Form: Analyzing recent return statistics, Silva has impressively secured 58.26% of their opponents' second serve points, whereas Berkieta trails slightly behind with a 47.11% success rate. Similarly, when it comes to first serve returns, Silva thrives with a 36.5% success rate compared to Berkieta's 30.56%. These figures carry considerable weight in discerning the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
3. Under Pressure Analysis: Under pressure, Silva has demonstrated remarkable resilience, saving 64.74% of breakpoints in recent matches. On the other hand, Berkieta's saving rate stands at 59.2%. This information proves valuable for in-game betting predictions.
4. Performance Overview: Examining the previous year's record, Silva has won 65.67% of matches played (W/L: 44/23), while Berkieta's victory percentage stands at 36.84% (W/L: 14/24). This comprehensive overview provides a significant insight into their head-to-head prediction.
5. Assessing Preferred Surfaces: Silva thrives best on Hard surfaces, boasting a 61% career win rate (W/L: 54/34). However, their performance on I.hard surfaces lags behind with a 46% success rate (W/L: 34/40). Conversely, Berkieta achieves their highest career surface win percentage on Hard courts, with a 45% success rate (W/L: 15/18), while struggling on Clay, winning only 18% of matches (W/L: 3/14).
6. Player Level: Over the past year, Silva has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments worth $10K. Notably, they have emerged victorious in 65.67% of matches (W/L: 44/23). In contrast, Berkieta's focus has also been on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments of the same value, achieving a win percentage of 41.18% (W/L: 14/20). When predicting the favorite player, the comparison of statistics must consider the relative event level in which they have been participating.
7. Opponent Quality Statistics: Looking at the past 12 months, Silva has faced opponents with an average rank of 210.63, whereas Berkieta's opponents had an average rank of 350.
8. Deciding Set Performance: For live predictions and betting enthusiasts, it is worth noting that when a match reaches a deciding set, Silva has emerged victorious in 67% of such situations in the past year, while Berkieta has only won 17% of all matches played in tour-level events.
9. Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performance holds significance in predicting tennis matches, considering the ongoing event it is also crucial to examine current event statistics to assess the form of players. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to the section below for up-to-date details if they have already played a match in the current event. Additionally, certain players may exhibit stronger performance at specific events, which must be taken into account when determining the anticipated outcome.
10. Break Point Conversion: In recent matches, Silva has capitalized on 46.76% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Berkieta has converted only 27.82% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This particular statistical parameter offers valuable guidance for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
11. If you are interested in models that accurately predict tennis match outcomes, you may find this article to be a valuable resource (Warning: Recommended for statistics enthusiasts only).